App Store Accountability Act (SB 142) ↗
Signed 2025-03-26; HB 498 (signed 2026-03-18) pushed the key app-store/developer obligations to 2027-05-06, removed AG enforcement, and left only a private right of action. CCIA's First Amendment challenge was voluntarily dismissed 2026-04-21.
Status is `delayed`: HB 498 (signed 2026-03-18) pushed the key app-store/developer obligations from 2026-05-06 to 2027-05-06. private_right_of_action is `true` (the PRA was retained and is now the sole enforcement path), but its exact commencement date could not be pinned to a verified source: the pre-HB-498 text set a private-action date of 2026-12-31, and reporting notes HB 498 modified the enforcement framework without a source stating the new PRA commencement relative to the 2027-05-06 operative date. Treat the PRA start date as unverified. Obligation section pins still need a pass against the enrolled SB 142 / HB 498 text.
Scope
Defines a 'developer' as a person that owns or controls a software application made available through an app store. The Act's primary duty-bearer is the app store provider, which carries the age-verification, age-category-assignment, and parental-consent-gateway duties; developer duties (age rating, obtaining age category and verifiable parental consent through the store's data-sharing method, enumerated-purpose limits on age-category data) attach to developers.
Penalties
- Model
- Other
- Detail
- After HB 498, enforcement is by private civil action only: a minor injured by a violation, or their parent/legal guardian, may sue an app store provider or developer. HB 498 removed the Utah AG's prior authority to enforce under the state deceptive-trade-practice framework.
- Enforcer
- Private plaintiffs only (minors harmed by a violation, or their parents/legal guardians); no state enforcer after HB 498
- Private right of action
- Yes
Key dates
- Signed
- 2025-03-26
- Effective
- 2025-05-07
- Enforcement begins
- 2027-05-06
Obligations (3)
Assign an age rating to the app and notify the app store of a significant change to the app.
Statute’s own ages: Age categories: child (under 13), younger teenager (13-15), older teenager (16-17), adult (18+).
Before a Utah minor uses the app, obtain the user's age category and, for minors, verifiable parental consent through the app store's data-sharing method.
Statute’s own ages: Minor categories: child (under 13), younger teenager (13-15), older teenager (16-17).
Use the age-category data received from the app store only to enforce age-related restrictions, comply with law, or implement safety features.
Litigation history
- 2026-02Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) filed a First Amendment challenge to SB 142→ Sought to block enforcement; obligations were not yet operative regardless source ↗
- 2026-03-18Governor signed HB 498, amending SB 142: delayed the key obligations to 2027-05-06 and removed the Utah AG's authority to enforce the Act (private right of action retained)→ Operational obligations remain not-yet-effective (now 2027-05-06); AG enforcement eliminated, leaving only private enforcement source ↗
- 2026-04-21CCIA voluntarily dismissed its challenge after HB 498 removed the AG enforcement authority it had targeted→ No active litigation; Act stands as amended, awaiting the 2027-05-06 operative date source ↗
Cross-state comparisons
- similartx-sb2420 (Texas): Near-identical app-store-accountability model: the app store verifies age and relays age-category + parental-consent signals, and app developers age-rate and consume those signals. The two diverge on posture: Utah's key duties are delayed to 2027-05-06 and, after HB 498, privately enforced only, whereas Texas SB 2420 is currently enforceable pending appeal with AG enforcement.