Parental Rights in Social Media Act (LB 383) ↗
Core age-verification and parental-consent provisions preliminarily enjoined 2026-06-27 (NetChoice v. Hilgers, D. Neb., Judge Gerrard), days before the 2026-07-01 effective date. The parental-dashboard provision was NOT enjoined and took effect. See the per-obligation override.
Regulation-level status is 'enjoined' to reflect that the Act's operative gating provisions (age verification, parental consent) are blocked; the surviving parental-dashboard provision is captured via a per-obligation enforcement_override. The injunction day was pinned to 2026-06-27 on re-verification (NetChoice's case page and Bloomberg Law/BGov both say June 27, the Saturday; Nebraska Public Media alone reports June 28). Penalty amount ($2,500/violation, per Hunton) and the private right of action (Hunton affirmatively reports one exists) remain unconfirmed against the enrolled text, so the PRA field stays 'unknown'. No appeal or stay of the injunction was found as of 2026-07-04. The Nebraska Legislature slip PDF geo-blocks non-US networks; existence confirmed via an archive.org snapshot (200).
Scope
Regulates 'social media platforms': services built around user accounts, user-generated content, and social interaction.
Nebraska's statutory 'social media platform' definition has not been pinned to the enrolled text; such acts commonly carve out services whose predominant purpose is e-commerce or direct messaging, and whether LB 383 contains such a carve-out is unverified.
Penalties
- Model
- Per violation
- Detail
- Enforced by the Nebraska Attorney General; a civil penalty (reported up to $2,500 per violation) is provided. Penalty amount reported by secondary analysis and not confirmed against the enrolled text; the enjoined provisions are unenforced pending litigation.
- Enforcer
- Nebraska Attorney General
- Private right of action
- Unverified; treated as unknown, not assumed absent
Key dates
- Enforcement begins
- 2026-07-01
Obligations (3)
Use a reasonable age-verification method to determine whether an account applicant is a minor before an account is created.
Statute’s own ages: Account holders 17 and under ('minor' = under 18).
Obtain express parental or guardian consent (verified identity plus a signed authorization) before a minor may create or hold an account; allow the parent to revoke consent and have the account removed.
Statute’s own ages: Account holders 17 and under ('minor' = under 18).
Give a consenting parent access to a dashboard to view the minor's posts and messages, control privacy and account settings, and monitor and limit time on the platform.
Statute’s own ages: Account holders 17 and under ('minor' = under 18).
Litigation history
- 2026-06-27U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska (Senior Judge John M. Gerrard) partially granted NetChoice's motion for a preliminary injunction in NetChoice v. Hilgers, enjoining LB 383's age-verification and express-parental-consent requirements as likely violating the First Amendment; the parental-activity-dashboard provision was left in force as likely narrowly tailored.→ Age-verification and parental-consent provisions unenforceable statewide pending further proceedings; the parental-dashboard provision remained enforceable and took effect 2026-07-01. source ↗
Cross-state comparisons
- similarar-act689 (Arkansas): Both mandate age verification plus parental consent before a minor may hold a social-media account, and both drew First Amendment challenges from NetChoice.
- similarga-sb351 (Georgia): Both condition minors' social-media accounts on age verification and parental consent and were preliminarily enjoined on First Amendment grounds.
- tensiontx-sb2420 (Texas): TX SB 2420 locates age-signal and parental-consent duties at the app-store layer; LB 383 places age-verification and parental-consent duties directly on the social-media platform.