Statewiseby[codeliance]Alpha
← Back to map

Nebraska

Researchedlast verified 2026-07-04

Has regulations

Two 2025 laws. LB 504 (Age-Appropriate Online Design Code Act) is in force: effective 2026-01-01, AG enforcement began 2026-07-01, no known challenge. LB 383 (Parental Rights in Social Media Act) had its core age-verification and parental-consent provisions preliminarily enjoined in late June 2026 (NetChoice v. Hilgers), while its parental-dashboard provision took effect 2026-07-01. See regulations ne-lb504 and ne-lb383.

Parental Rights in Social Media Act (LB 383)

EnjoinedResearchedlast verified 2026-07-04
Social media platform

Core age-verification and parental-consent provisions preliminarily enjoined 2026-06-27 (NetChoice v. Hilgers, D. Neb., Judge Gerrard), days before the 2026-07-01 effective date. The parental-dashboard provision was NOT enjoined and took effect. See the per-obligation override.

Regulation-level status is 'enjoined' to reflect that the Act's operative gating provisions (age verification, parental consent) are blocked; the surviving parental-dashboard provision is captured via a per-obligation enforcement_override. The injunction day was pinned to 2026-06-27 on re-verification (NetChoice's case page and Bloomberg Law/BGov both say June 27, the Saturday; Nebraska Public Media alone reports June 28). Penalty amount ($2,500/violation, per Hunton) and the private right of action (Hunton affirmatively reports one exists) remain unconfirmed against the enrolled text, so the PRA field stays 'unknown'. No appeal or stay of the injunction was found as of 2026-07-04. The Nebraska Legislature slip PDF geo-blocks non-US networks; existence confirmed via an archive.org snapshot (200).

Scope

Regulates 'social media platforms': services built around user accounts, user-generated content, and social interaction.

Nebraska's statutory 'social media platform' definition has not been pinned to the enrolled text; such acts commonly carve out services whose predominant purpose is e-commerce or direct messaging, and whether LB 383 contains such a carve-out is unverified.

Penalties

Model
Per violation
Detail
Enforced by the Nebraska Attorney General; a civil penalty (reported up to $2,500 per violation) is provided. Penalty amount reported by secondary analysis and not confirmed against the enrolled text; the enjoined provisions are unenforced pending litigation.
Enforcer
Nebraska Attorney General
Private right of action
Unverified; treated as unknown, not assumed absent

Key dates

Enforcement begins
2026-07-01

Obligations (3)

Age verification / estimationUnder 1313–1516–17

Use a reasonable age-verification method to determine whether an account applicant is a minor before an account is created.

Statute’s own ages: Account holders 17 and under ('minor' = under 18).

Neb. LB 383 (109th Leg., 2025): Parental Rights in Social Media Act; section pin pending primary-text verification
Parental consentUnder 1313–1516–17

Obtain express parental or guardian consent (verified identity plus a signed authorization) before a minor may create or hold an account; allow the parent to revoke consent and have the account removed.

Statute’s own ages: Account holders 17 and under ('minor' = under 18).

Neb. LB 383 (109th Leg., 2025); section pin pending primary-text verification
Parental tools & visibilityUnder 1313–1516–17

Give a consenting parent access to a dashboard to view the minor's posts and messages, control privacy and account settings, and monitor and limit time on the platform.

Statute’s own ages: Account holders 17 and under ('minor' = under 18).

In forceThis provision differs from the law’s overall status: Unlike the age-verification and parental-consent provisions, the parental-dashboard provision was NOT enjoined in NetChoice v. Hilgers (the court found it likely narrowly tailored), so it took effect 2026-07-01 and remains enforceable pending further proceedings.
Neb. LB 383 (109th Leg., 2025); section pin pending primary-text verification

Litigation history

  1. 2026-06-27
    U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska (Senior Judge John M. Gerrard) partially granted NetChoice's motion for a preliminary injunction in NetChoice v. Hilgers, enjoining LB 383's age-verification and express-parental-consent requirements as likely violating the First Amendment; the parental-activity-dashboard provision was left in force as likely narrowly tailored.
    Age-verification and parental-consent provisions unenforceable statewide pending further proceedings; the parental-dashboard provision remained enforceable and took effect 2026-07-01. source ↗

Cross-state comparisons

  • similarar-act689 (Arkansas): Both mandate age verification plus parental consent before a minor may hold a social-media account, and both drew First Amendment challenges from NetChoice.
  • similarga-sb351 (Georgia): Both condition minors' social-media accounts on age verification and parental consent and were preliminarily enjoined on First Amendment grounds.
  • tensiontx-sb2420 (Texas): TX SB 2420 locates age-signal and parental-consent duties at the app-store layer; LB 383 places age-verification and parental-consent duties directly on the social-media platform.

Age-Appropriate Online Design Code Act (LB 504)

In forceResearchedlast verified 2026-07-04
Online service accessed by minors

Effective 2026-01-01; Attorney General enforcement began 2026-07-01. No known court challenge to LB 504 as of 2026-07-04 (unlike Nebraska's separate LB 383, which was partially enjoined).

LB 504 is Nebraska's Kids-Code design code and is distinct from LB 383 (Parental Rights in Social Media Act), which imposes account-level age verification/parental consent and was partially enjoined. The Nebraska Legislature slip PDF geo-blocks non-US networks; existence confirmed via an archive.org snapshot (200). Obligation decomposition and thresholds are drawn from corroborating law-firm analyses (Koley Jessen, Reed Smith, Hunton) and CSG Midwest; sources conflict on whether the coverage thresholds are conjunctive. Re-verify against the slip text before promoting to 'verified'. Private right of action not confirmed against statutory text (marked unknown).

Scope

Binds a 'covered online service' likely accessed by minors.

Coverage conditions
  • CCPA-style thresholds keyed on $25M+ annual gross revenue plus data-volume or data-sale prongs: buying/receiving/selling data of 50,000+ consumers, households, or devices, and/or deriving 50%+ of revenue from selling or sharing personal data.
Express exemptions
  • Exemption for services with actual knowledge that fewer than 2% of users are minors.

Secondary analyses differ on whether the coverage-threshold prongs are conjunctive or disjunctive; re-verify against the slip text.

Penalties

Model
Per violation
Detail
Civil penalty up to $50,000 per violation; a violation is a deceptive trade practice under the Nebraska Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.
Enforcer
Nebraska Attorney General
Private right of action
Unverified; treated as unknown, not assumed absent

Key dates

Signed
2025-05-30
Effective
2026-01-01
Enforcement begins
2026-07-01

Obligations (5)

Default-high privacy for minorsUnder 1313–1516–17

Set the default settings of covered design features to the highest level of privacy protection available for minor users.

Statute’s own ages: Applies to 'minors'; the Act is styled as an Age-Appropriate Online Design Code (under-18 model). Exact statutory age cut-lines pending primary-text verification.

Neb. LB 504 (109th Leg., 2025): Age-Appropriate Online Design Code Act; section pin pending primary-text verification
Addictive-feature restrictionsUnder 1313–1516–17

Give minors accessible tools to opt out of or limit engagement-maximizing design features, for example a chronological (non-algorithmic) feed option, and controls over notifications, autoplay, and in-app/in-game purchases.

Statute’s own ages: Applies to minor account holders; precise age scope pending primary-text verification.

Neb. LB 504 (109th Leg., 2025); section pin pending primary-text verification
Minor data protectionUnder 1313–1516–17

Collect only the minimum personal data necessary to provide the service the minor requests; restrict profiling except where strictly necessary, limit precise-geolocation sharing with notice, and do not deliver targeted advertising to minors.

Statute’s own ages: Applies to minor account holders; precise age scope pending primary-text verification.

Neb. LB 504 (109th Leg., 2025); section pin pending primary-text verification
Parental tools & visibilityUnder 13

Provide parental tools (privacy management, blocking financial transactions, and limiting time on the service); these tools are enabled by default for known children under 13.

Statute’s own ages: Default-on parental tools apply to known children under 13; parental tools are otherwise available for minor accounts.

Neb. LB 504 (109th Leg., 2025); section pin pending primary-text verification
Curfew / time restrictionsUnder 1313–1516–17

Suppress push notifications to minors during school hours (8 a.m.–4 p.m.) and overnight (10 p.m.–6 a.m.); sources differ on whether both windows are limited to weekdays during the school year.

Statute’s own ages: Applies to minor account holders; precise age scope pending primary-text verification.

Neb. LB 504 (109th Leg., 2025); section pin pending primary-text verification

Cross-state comparisons

  • similarmd-kids-code (Maryland): Both are Age-Appropriate Design Code statutes imposing default-privacy, design-feature, and data-minimization duties on online services likely accessed by minors, rather than hard account-level age gates.