Statewiseby[codeliance]Alpha
← Back to map

Connecticut

Researchedlast verified 2026-07-04

Has regulations

One tracked regulation: ct-sb3 (Connecticut Data Privacy Act minor protections, Public Act 23-56 / SB 3), in force since 2024-10-01 and tightened by SB 1295 (effective 2026-07-01) into a categorical ban on processing minors' data for targeted advertising or sale plus a bar on engagement-extending design features. Delaware-style base comprehensive privacy exists but the distinct minor-safety regime is the in-scope item authored here.

The minor online-safety provisions added to the Connecticut Data Privacy Act by Public Act 23-56 took effect 2024-10-01 (the social-media account unpublish/delete duty began 2024-07-01). SB 1295 (signed 2025-06-24, effective 2026-07-01) tightened them into a categorical ban on targeted advertising and sale of minors' data and a bar on engagement-extending design features. No known court challenge as of 2026-07-04.

Primary Public Act 23-56 PDF verified (HTTP 200; the server presents an incomplete TLS chain, though a February 2026 archive.org snapshot corroborates it, so confirm in the US-based CI link check). Effective dates verified via multiple law-firm analyses (Wilmer, FPF, Hunton, Inside Privacy). SB 1295 (signed 2025-06-24, effective 2026-07-01) is folded in here as the operative amendment rather than a separate record; its public-act chapter number and codified section pins still need a primary-text pass. The categorical targeted-ad/sale ban and lowered CTDPA thresholds are from law-firm reporting on SB 1295. No civil-penalty amount or private right of action beyond AG/CUTPA enforcement is asserted.

Scope

The minor provisions bind a controller under the Connecticut Data Privacy Act offering an online service, product, or feature to consumers the controller has actual knowledge of, or willfully disregards, are minors (under 18).

Coverage conditions
  • Coverage of the base CTDPA turns on processing thresholds, which SB 1295 lowered to 35,000 Connecticut consumers; the minor provisions apply on the actual-knowledge/willful-disregard trigger.

Penalties

Model
Other
Detail
A violation is enforced by the Attorney General as an unfair trade practice under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act; the CTDPA's cure period narrowed over time. No civil-penalty amount is verified here for the minor provisions.
Enforcer
Connecticut Attorney General (exclusive)
Private right of action
No

Key dates

Signed
2023-06-26
Effective
2024-10-01

Obligations (2)

DPIA / risk assessmentUnder 1313–1516–17

Use reasonable care to avoid any heightened risk of harm to minors caused by an online service, product, or feature, and conduct a data protection assessment for any such service that presents a heightened risk of harm to minors.

Statute’s own ages: Applies to minors (consumers under 18); no narrower statutory subdivision for this duty.

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42-515 et seq. (Public Act 23-56, as amended by SB 1295 of 2025), section pin pending primary-text verification
Minor data protectionUnder 1313–1516–17

Do not process a minor's personal data for targeted advertising or for sale (a categorical ban after SB 1295), restrict profiling and secondary uses, limit precise-geolocation collection, and do not use a system design feature to significantly increase, sustain, or extend a minor's use of the service.

Statute’s own ages: Applies to minors under 18; SB 1295 made the targeted-advertising and sale limits categorical rather than consent-based.

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42-515 et seq. (Public Act 23-56, as amended by SB 1295), section pin pending primary-text verification

Cross-state comparisons

  • similarco-sb24-041 (Colorado): Close cousin: both graft a minor-safety regime onto a comprehensive state privacy act using an actual-knowledge/willful-disregard trigger, a reasonable-care duty against heightened risk of harm, data protection assessments, and a bar on system-design features that extend minors' use.
  • similarne-lb504 (Nebraska): Overlapping duties on minor data minimization and engagement-extending design features, though Nebraska's LB 504 is a standalone Age-Appropriate Design Code and Connecticut's are amendments to its comprehensive privacy act.